
J. Food Sci. Gastron. (January - June 2025) 3(1): 16-2117
Introduction
The oricultural activity in Ecuador began 30 years ago
(Sozoranga & Vélez, 2016) and has become one of the
country’s main agricultural products, alongside bananas
and cocoa. The oriculture sector ranks third globally as an
exporter (Camino-Mogro et al., 2016). The rose is the most
produced ower, with an area of 4,282 hectares in annual
production, of which 935 hectares are open-eld crops, and
the rest are greenhouse crops. The primary residue generated
is the stems, with an annual production of 2,557,870,384 cut
stems (ESPAC, 2020). These residues can be transformed
into a solution for environmental pollutants if converted into
value-added products.
In Ecuador, petroleum and non-petroleum income sources
are key to the country’s economy. The main non-petroleum
exports are cocoa, bananas, shrimp, and owers, contrib-
uting to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (Freire et al.,
2018). The increase in production costs and the economic
crisis caused by the depreciation of international markets af-
fected the sector (Poveda, 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic
in 2020 impacted various areas, including oriculture, due
to a mandatory reduction in exports (Morocho et al., 2021).
Regarding plastic management, they have a complex re-
cycling process. In Ecuador, approximately 261,778 tons of
soft plastic waste are generated (López & Miranda, 2024).
Many of these plastics end up as pollution in landlls, high-
lighting the need for alternative solutions. One option is
biodegradable plastics based on polymers, such as cellulose
combined with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and starch, which
the environment can absorb as they break down into CO
2
,
water, or biomass (Avellán et al., 2020).
Conventional plastics derived from petroleum do not de-
grade quickly in the environment, thus contributing to envi-
ronmental pollution (Ponce & Zambrano, 2019). This article
addresses the need to reduce plastic and ower waste pol-
lution. This research aimed to develop biodegradable lms
from rose stems with potential applications for food preser-
vation.
Materials and methods
The stems generated at the Guayaquil Flower Market were
quantied weekly for 15 days, classifying them according to
the leading sales. The rose stems’ moisture content, ash, cel-
lulose, and lignin were determined. Cellulose extraction was
carried out through alkaline and acidic hydrolysis, following
the procedures of Jiménez et al. (2019).
The bioplastic was prepared using the molding method,
with 24 formulations and a two-factor design, to determine
the eectiveness of the mixtures. To characterize the bio-
lms, the thickness, water vapor permeability, opacity, water
absorption, water contact angle, and biodegradability were
evaluated (Kwok & Neumann, 1999; Vicentini, 2003; Joaqui
& Villada, 2013).
The biodegradability percentage of the biolms was de-
termined through a humus degradation experiment, in which
external factors such as pH and humidity were controlled.
Then, the loss due to degradation was calculated.
Results and discussion
Table 1 shows the results of the characterization of rose
stems. During the raw material’s collection and storage
phases, moisture loss occurred, leading to the concentration
of lignocellulosic components, which may explain the dier-
ences between the results and the reference values.
Table 1. Composition of rose stems
Indicator Percentage Reference
Moisture 60.64 65.3 % (González et al., 2016)
Ash 3.63 3.45 % (Rincón, 2020)
Cellulose 48.45 45-50 % (González et al., 2016)
Lignin 28.28 20-25 % (González et al., 2016)
The bioplastics composed of 10 µm cellulose and PVA
were softer, more manageable, and translucent than the cel-
lulose-starch formulations. The lms with 200 µm cellulose
were discarded due to their paper-like characteristics. Ac-
cording to the INEN 2636 standard (2012), all formulations
met the thickness requirement (0.25 mm). The formulations
with the thinnest thickness were the cellulose-PVA lms,
while the thickest were the cellulose-starch lms.
As seen in Figure 1, the bioplastics with 10 µm cellulose
and starch, at concentrations of 20 and 60 mL, showed sim-
ilar moisture content. In the case of the bioplastics with 200
µm, the moisture was similar for the 10 and 20 mL concen-
trations. Both treatments exhibited similar behavior regard-
less of concentration and thickness.