From parental authority to parental responsibility legal evolution and challenges for the protection of children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21208915Keywords:
Filiation, parental responsibility, parental authority, best interests of the child, children's rightsAbstract
The transformation of Family Law over recent decades has profoundly redefined the traditional concept of parental authority, shifting from a model based on parental prerogatives to one centred on parental responsibility and the comprehensive protection of children's rights. This study aims to examine the legal evolution of filiation and parental authority from a historical, comparative and human rights perspective, identifying the main challenges arising from the transition towards parental responsibility within Latin American legal systems. A qualitative legal methodology was adopted, combining doctrinal, normative, jurisprudential and comparative analysis. The review included national legislation, international human rights instruments, case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and specialised scientific literature published between 2020 and 2026. The findings reveal a progressive trend towards replacing the traditional concept of parental authority with parental responsibility, understood as a legal function guided by the best interests of the child, shared parental responsibilities and respect for the child's evolving capacities. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain regarding assisted reproduction, socio-affective filiation, diverse family structures and legislative harmonisation across Latin America. The study concludes that consolidating the parental responsibility paradigm requires a reinterpretation of traditional Family Law institutions in accordance with international child protection standards.
Downloads
References
Abreu, D. A. D., & Ferreira, F. B. (2025). To be a mother or to be lesbian? Considerations about the case Atala Riffo and children vs. Chile in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Revista Direito e Práxis, 16(3), e85557. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2025/85557
Anggraini, r. M., & tjempaka, t. (2025). Protection of children’s rights in custody disputes awarding guardianship to grandparents from the perspective of the convention on the rights of the child. Awang Long Law Review, 8(1), 230-241. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i1.1884
Antokolskaia, M. (2024). European Family Law (2nd ed.). Intersentia.
Argentina. Honorable Congreso de la Nación. (2014). Ley 26.994. Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-26994-235975
Argentina. Honorable Congreso de la Nación. (2014). Ley 26.994. Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-26994-235975
Baghdasaryan, B., & Vosloo, S. (2026). Children's Best Interests in Digital Policy and Practice. UNICEF Innocenti. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/childrens-best-interests-digital-policy-and-practice
Chelouche-Dwek, G., & Fonagy, P. (2026). Parent learning groups in alternative provision: A mixed-methods study of psychoeducation, mentalization, and peer support for parents of children with neurodevelopmental and conduct difficulties. Children, 13(3), 431. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/13/3/431
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General comment No. 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1), CRC/C/GC/14. United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/778523
Consejo Nacional para la Igualdad Intergeneracional. (2017). Código de la Niñez y Adolescencia. https://www.igualdad.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/11/codigo_ninezyadolescencia.pdf
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2012, 24 de febrero). Caso Atala Riffo y niñas vs. Chile. Fondo, reparaciones y costas. Sentencia. Serie C No. 239. https://corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_239_esp.pdf
Council of Europe. (2024). Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225). https://rm.coe.int/1680afae3c
Couzens, M. (2025). The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Domestic Courts: A Comparative International Law Perspective. Cambridge University Press. http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1311565
Dietrich, F. (2022), Critical Reflection and the Limits of Parental Authority. J Appl Philos, 39: 562-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12555
Duncan, R., & Vosloo, S. (2026) Skills for an AI World: Where We May Be Tomorrow. UNICEF Innocenti. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/stories/skills-ai-world-where-we-may-be-tomorrow
Ecuador. Asamblea Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (2023). Fedotova and Others v. Russia (Applications Nos. 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14), Grand Chamber, Judgment of 17 January 2023. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
European Parliament. (2024). Regulation on the recognition of parenthood between Member States. Legislative Train Schedule. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-legal-affairs-juri/file-recognition-of-parenthood-between-member-states
Fenton-Glynn, C. (2021). Children and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780191091452_A40905118/preview-9780191091452_A40905118.pdf
Freeman, M., & Taylor, N. (Eds.). (2025). Children's Right to Identity, Selfhood and International Family Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/children-s-right-to-identity-selfhood-and-international-family-law-9781035313921.html
Gardner, J. F. (1998). Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/family-and-familia-in-roman-law-and-life-9780198152170?cc=ec&lang=en&
Herrera, M., Caramelo, G., & Picasso, S. (Dirs.). (2015). Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación comentado. Infojus. http://www.bibliotecadigital.gob.ar/items/show/2758
Herring, J. (2023). Family Law (11th ed.). Pearson.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2012). Case of Atala Riffo and Daughters v. Chile. Judgment of 24 February 2012 (Merits, Reparations and Costs), Series C No. 239. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_239_ing.pdf
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2012). Case of Fornerón and Daughter v. Argentina. Judgment of 27 April 2012 (Merits, Reparations and Costs), Series C No. 242. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_242_ing.pdf
Kilkelly, U. (2024). International Children's Rights. Routledge. https://centraleuropeanacademy.hu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/INTERNATIONAL-CHILDRENS-RIGHTS-_korr_02.pdf
Kilkelly, U. (2024). The child and the European convention on human rights. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003579427
Lowe, N., & Douglas, G. (2022). Bromley's Family Law (12th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806691.001.0001
Margaletić, A. Č., & Preložnjak, B. (2024). Challenges of Protecting the Rights of Children and Parents When Separating a Child from the Family. EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 8, 515-536. https://ojs.srce.hr/index.php/eclic/article/view/32290
OAS. (1969). American Convention on Human Rights. https://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/b-32.html
Parliament of the United Kingdom. (1989). Children Act 1989. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/contents
Parliament of the United Kingdom. (1995). Children (Scotland) Act 1995. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/36/contents
Reino de España. (1889). Real Decreto de 24 de julio de 1889 por el que se publica el Código Civil (texto consolidado). https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1889-4763
Silva Niño de Zepeda, R. (2022). Inter-American Children and their Rights: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Judicial Decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 30(2), 552-576. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-30020006
Smith, L. (2025). Family law for family life: Rethinking the boundaries of family law. Current Legal Problems, 78(1), 271–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuaf001
Tobin, J. (Ed.). (2019). The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780191544170_A36483137/preview-9780191544170_A36483137.pdf
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
Published
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alfredo A. Chilembelenbe-Seyungo , Rosária L. Correia-Dumbo, Eunice N. Martins-Chipululo , Luís Calei-Brito, Alberto K. Kavinda-Canjamba (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
