Influence of neuroleadership in Higher Education Management in Cumaná, Venezuela
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18271249Keywords:
neuroleadership, educational management, decision- making, organizational climateAbstract
The management of higher education institutions in Cumaná , Venezuela, has become progressively complex due to resource scarcity and the need for rapid adaptation to a constantly changing environment. Given this scenario, the present study analyzes the influence of neuroliderazgo ( neurolidership ) on strategic decision-making and organizational climate, providing a theoretical contribution to the existing literature that connects neuroliderazgo with educational management. To achieve this, a documentary research methodology was employed, based on an exhaustive review and a critical analysis that triangulated the theoretical contributions of neuroliderazgo with the contextual reality of Cumaná’s universities. The findings revealed that neuroliderazgo emerges as a strategic tool, capable of optimizing decision-making by fostering emotional regulation and self-awareness in leaders. Likewise, it was emphasized that traditional management models, based on pure rationality, are insufficient to address the challenges involving stress, decisional fatigue, and the cognitive biases inherent in managerial work. As a closing thought, it is highlighted that the principles of neuroleadership, focused on social cognition and empathy, are fundamental for building a climate of trust and collaboration, even in high-pressure environments. In short, this research argues that neuroliderazgo is not just an emerging discipline, but an operational necessity for resilient and effective educational management in the Cumaná region.
Downloads
References
Akşahin, H. (2023). Contributions of neuroleadership to school administrators and teachers for the development of organizational behavior. Sustainability, 15(21), 15443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115443
BeUp, F (2023) Neuroliderazgo Corporativo e institucional: Qué es y cómo aplicarlo. 28002 Madrid. España.
Botero, G. (2009). Comunicación organizacional y su relación con el clima organizacional en las instituciones de educación superior. (Tesis doctoral). Universidad del Zulia.
Casassus, J. (2000). Problemas de la gestión educativa en América Latina (la tensión entre los paradigmas de tipo A y el tipo B. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO.
Díaz Acosta, N. E. (2025). Neuroliderazgo e innovación organizacional: revisión y perspectivas para la gestión moderna. MLAJ Revista, 160.
Duarte, H. M. (2024). Organizational cognitive neuroscience and its applications to leadership perception. Organizational Studies Journal.
Dulzaides I., & Molina G., C. A. (2004). Análisis documental y de información: dos componentes de un mismo proceso. ACIMED, 12(2). Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94352004000200011
García, C. (2015). Implicaciones de la transcomplejidad. Investigación. Una visión transcompleja. San Joaquín de Turmero: UBA
Hernández, Fernández y Baptista (2014) Nuevos Métodos Para La Investigación Del Comportamiento Humano. U.S.B. Caracas.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1982). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice-Hall.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Editorial Debate. California. EEUU
MLAJ Revista (2025). Neuroliderazgo: revisión bibliográfica y perspectivas para la gestión moderna. MLAJ Revista.
Morgado, C., Aldana, J. e Isea, J. (2019). Gerencia transformacional desde el accionar docente directivo para el abordaje del Contexto Escolar. Revista CIENCIAMATRIA. Recuperado de https://www.cienciamatriarevista.org.ve/index.php/cm/article/view/99
Neuroleadership Institute (2025). The future of leadership: neuroscience backed trends shaping the workplace [Blog post]. NeuroLeadership Institute
Pedler, Burgoyne y Boydell (2020). Gestión Educativa y Neuroliderazgo en el nivel de Educación superior. Grupo Planeta, ISBN 84-320-8012-8.
Reyes, Ruiz, L., & Alvarado C, (2020). La investigación documental para la comprensión ontológica del objeto de estudio. Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar.
Robbins, S., Judge, T. (2024) Organizational Behavior. Edition Pearson Education. 19th edition. San Diego State University. United States.
Rock, D., Schwartz, J. (2006). The Neuroscience of Leadership. Strategy+Business, Vol.43. California. EEUU
Ruiz Rodríguez, R., Ortiz de Urbina Criado, M., & Ravina Ripoll, R. (2023). Neuroleadership: a new way for happiness management. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 10071247. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071247/
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. Wiley.
Sushma, R. D., & Satish, N. D. S. (2025). Neuroscientific foundations of cognitive leadership and its impact on decision-making and organizational performance. Journal of Marketing & Social Research, 2(6), 150–158.
Valverde, T (2018), Trabajo de Grado “La gerencia educativa y su aporte en la resolución de conflictos”. Universidad de Salamanca. España.
Vargas, W (2019), Trabajo de investigación “Neuroliderazgo. El trabajo en equipo y la evaluación de la inteligencia Emocional en el ámbito universitario. Mar del Plata Argentina.
Walter R. (2007). “El poder del pensamiento flexible”. Grupo editorial Norma. Colombia
Published
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dorka J. Cárdenas (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



























